The Criterion Collection is written as “gathering the greatest films from around the world and publishing them in editions of the highest technical quality…” Wages of Fear is one of the first movies to join the Criterion Collection and comes to us from acclaimed suspense director Henri Georges Clouzot. The film arrived in movie theaters in 1953 in France and didn’t hit the U.S. until two years later. How does this alleged classic fair on Blu-ray? Let’s find out…
Film 
Storytelling is a timeless art and that certainly applies to films. Yes, we have greater technologies and capabilities in movie-making than we did ten years ago, let alone fifty years ago. Nevertheless, there are still countless classics from the past. Wages of Fear has been built up to be one such movie, but does it really measure up? A little earlier, I mentioned that director, Henri Georges Clouzot, was known for suspense in his films. Yes, he does deliver suspense in Wages of Fear. He also manages to drag out the movie in such an incredibly annoying fashion that not only did I find myself constantly checking to see how much time was left in the film, but I also debated whether or not to hit the fast-forward button. Shame on me for thinking that, but it is what it is.
This movie is two and a half hours in length and now that I have watched it, I can say with confidence that forty minutes could have easily been axed from this film. The acting is good, but there are far too many occurrences taking place that have absolutely nothing to do with driving the story. These items excel as nothing more than distractions. There certainly are little nuances to keep an eye on that do have a discreet message behind them. That aside, I look back on a lot of the sequences during the film and ask, “What’s the point??”
The film has a severe tendency to drag on and while Clouzot may have had the intent to create suspense by doing this, it backfired…tremendously. I do congratulate him on the irony presented at the film’s closure, but other than that, watching Wages of Fear is like trying to walk through knee-deep mud. You get nowhere fast.
Video 
I could be wrong, but I do believe that this is the first black and white film to be released on Blu-ray. I have one question. Why? Is it to have the sharpest grays, blacks, and whites possible? I do understand that this film was cleaned up from its previous appearance, but as a guest speaker said at a Blu-ray discussion at the San Diego Comic Con last year, “What’s the point of putting black and white films on Blu-ray?” Perhaps one would need to compare this 1080p version of Wages of Fear against its “not cleaned up” counterpart. It is presented in its original 1.33:1 aspect ratio with a very uncommon Linear PCM encode. There is grain present throughout the film, but believe it or not, in no way is it distracting. Some color films from today’s era should take note of this. This is probably the most difficult rating I have had to apply to a movie because you have to consider the source of the actual film reel. We’re talking 1953 black and white. You can’t really fault this.
Audio 
Monaural. That means no rear speakers, no subwoofer, no complete utilization of your wonderful surround sound, period. What else is there to be said here? There is absolutely no pizzazz in the audio category. There is no Dolby 5.1 or anything of the like to be found. Ah, it seems like only a paragraph ago when I said the video for Wages of Fear was the most difficult rating I ever had to apply. Scratch that and replace the word “video” with “audio.” I know, I know…if the video rating isn’t going to suffer based on the original source, how can the audio? Good point. However, the video is clean as far as black and white goes. The audio has gone through restoration but it’s still dead to the senses. Hooray for the eliminating the pops and hisses, but this category is for surround sound audio.
Special Features 
The extras on the Wages of Fear disc, labeled as “Supplements” on the menu, are few but bear some meat as far as their running time. Only the first extra regarding the assistant director appears in High Definition as 1080i, as the rest are in a standard def presentation.
- Michel Romanoff – a piece about the film’s assistant director (22:26).
- Marc Godin - a segment about the co-author of the book, Clouzot: Cineaste (10:09).
- Yves Montand - This is an interview from 1988 with the lead actor of Wages of Fear (5:00).
- Henri Georges Clouzot: The Enlightened Tyrant - A French documentary with English subtitles about the acclaimed French director (52:34).
- Censored - An interesting look at the scenes cut from Wages of Fear for its 1955 U.S. release. It also goes in-depth to discuss the media’s view on the film at that time (12:12).
Final Thoughts 
As a French-based film set in South America, it includes dialogue in Spanish, Italian, English and of course French. It is certainly a multi-cultural film, but does not really put its shoes on until the latter portion of its run-time. I expected more out of this but the story was such a mish-mosh early on that it left a bad taste in my mouth and continued to struggle in reaching some relevant substance. There was nothing to be gained by drawing out so much of the character development or the illusion thereof.




I agree with Gregg. And kudos to Gregg for sitting through this one. I know I could not. I am not sure what “criteria” Criterion bases their decisions on for what movies are picked and what are not. It kind of makes me curious to see just how good this upcoming “Benjamin Button” movie has to be (or isn’t if that is the case). But let me get this straight. They could not go back and mix in some kind of ambient 5.1 sound? You have this awesome video reference, but a 2.0 mono soundtrack? Something just is not right here. Thanks Gregg! I will stay far away from this one
“I could be wrong, but I do believe that this is the first black and white film to be released on Blu-ray.” Wrong. Casabanca and The Third Man have both been released in the United States prior to this and there have been a handful of international releases like The Seventh Seal and Great Expectations.
“I have one question. Why? Is it to have the sharpest grays, blacks, and whites possible?” These films can gain significant resolution from a blu-ray transfer and the enhanced color scale of blu-ray associates to greyscale as well creating much better contrast than is available on DVD.
“Monaural. That means no rear speakers, no subwoofer, no complete utilization of your wonderful surround sound, period. What else is there to be said here?” What else is to be said? How about being faithful to the original film release. Providing the best possible representation of that original theatrical experience. If they provided a 5.1 track it would be a fabrication and unrealistic. Perhaps they should have included that option, but I for one applaud Criterion for maintaining the original theatric presentation.
Kyle…I see your point and I see Gregg’s. Unfortunately, I tend to be biased in the fact that I am judging the book by it’s cover here as from what I have read in Gregg’s review here I feel fairly confident that he has saved me from 2 hours of my life being wasted. With that being said, I am not naive in my thinking that I am sure there are countless fans out there extremely appreciative of having this classic film on the Blu-ray format. I agree with you 100% about the B&W looking beautiful on Blu-ray (Sin City for example
). However, I like Gregg, cannot get over the fact that they could have included a 5.1 track as well as kept the original monaural track too.
In all seriousness, thank you for the education on why a black and white film would go to Blu-ray. Now I have a better understanding on why studio folks are making the transfer. I honestly did contemplate this when I first heard of its release. As for “The Wages of Fear” not being the first black and white Blu-ray, well, I did say, “I could be wrong…”
As for the audio, it stunk. Not colorizing a film is remaining faithful to the original. Leaving a monaural soundtrack was unimaginative and VERY lackluster and in my opinion, an easy out. With all the technology today, I am quite certain they could have added the 5.1 audio track without it sounding artificial and/or out of place.
Brian, thank you for the reinforcement.
Kyle, thank you for your posting and I do appreciate the feedback.
I found the film to be quite engrossing. Yes, it is slow to start, but that just better establishes the desperation of their situation. Once they begin their journey in the trucks they are just one bad bump from destruction. This is not an action film, anyone thinking it is will be dissappointed. However, for those expecting a taut dramatic thriller filled with desperate characters their is much to be enjoyed.
The politics of American imperialism as presented in the film is certainly not as controversial now a days as it was at the time of this films release.
The only issue I had with the film is the sole female character of Linda. She is a punching bag for the dregs of her community, constantly abused and derided while seemingly perpetually asking for more.
4/5
…minus 1.5