Posted on 11 March 2010
“Promise me no one will get hurt.” “No one will get hurt, I promise.” Once those two sentences are uttered near the beginning of Armored, you knew just how this film was going to unfold and that despite the promise, there will be quite few fatalities. Armored, the subject of today’s review, is a heist film that is rather formulaic and predictable. Be that as it may, is is still worth a look on Blu-ray? Sort of. Read the full story
Posted on 11 March 2010
“Promise me no one will get hurt.” “No one will get hurt, I promise.” Once those two sentences are uttered near the beginning of Armored, you knew just how this film was going to unfold and that despite the promise, there will be quite few fatalities. Armored, the subject of today’s review, is a heist film that is rather formulaic and predictable. Be that as it may, is is still worth a look on Blu-ray? Sort of. Read the full story
Posted on 11 March 2010
“Promise me no one will get hurt.” “No one will get hurt, I promise.” Once those two sentences are uttered near the beginning of Armored, you knew just how this film was going to unfold and that despite the promise, there will be quite few fatalities. Armored, the subject of today’s review, is a heist film that is rather formulaic and predictable. Be that as it may, is is still worth a look on Blu-ray? Sort of. Read the full story
Posted on 11 March 2010
“Promise me no one will get hurt.” “No one will get hurt, I promise.” Once those two sentences are uttered near the beginning of Armored, you knew just how this film was going to unfold and that despite the promise, there will be quite few fatalities. Armored, the subject of today’s review, is a heist film that is rather formulaic and predictable. Be that as it may, is is still worth a look on Blu-ray? Sort of. Read the full story
Posted on 11 March 2010
“Promise me no one will get hurt.” “No one will get hurt, I promise.” Once those two sentences are uttered near the beginning of Armored, you knew just how this film was going to unfold and that despite the promise, there will be quite few fatalities. Armored, the subject of today’s review, is a heist film that is rather formulaic and predictable. Be that as it may, is is still worth a look on Blu-ray? Sort of. Read the full story
Posted on 11 March 2010
“Promise me no one will get hurt.” “No one will get hurt, I promise.” Once those two sentences are uttered near the beginning of Armored, you knew just how this film was going to unfold and that despite the promise, there will be quite few fatalities. Armored, the subject of today’s review, is a heist film that is rather formulaic and predictable. Be that as it may, is is still worth a look on Blu-ray? Sort of. Read the full story
Posted on 11 March 2010
“Promise me no one will get hurt.” “No one will get hurt, I promise.” Once those two sentences are uttered near the beginning of Armored, you knew just how this film was going to unfold and that despite the promise, there will be quite few fatalities. Armored, the subject of today’s review, is a heist film that is rather formulaic and predictable. Be that as it may, is is still worth a look on Blu-ray? Sort of. Read the full story
Posted on 11 March 2010
“Promise me no one will get hurt.” “No one will get hurt, I promise.” Once those two sentences are uttered near the beginning of Armored, you knew just how this film was going to unfold and that despite the promise, there will be quite few fatalities. Armored, the subject of today’s review, is a heist film that is rather formulaic and predictable. Be that as it may, is is still worth a look on Blu-ray? Sort of. Read the full story
Posted on 11 March 2010
“Promise me no one will get hurt.” “No one will get hurt, I promise.” Once those two sentences are uttered near the beginning of Armored, you knew just how this film was going to unfold and that despite the promise, there will be quite few fatalities. Armored, the subject of today’s review, is a heist film that is rather formulaic and predictable. Be that as it may, is is still worth a look on Blu-ray? Sort of. Read the full story
Posted on 11 March 2010
“Promise me no one will get hurt.” “No one will get hurt, I promise.” Once those two sentences are uttered near the beginning of Armored, you knew just how this film was going to unfold and that despite the promise, there will be quite few fatalities. Armored, the subject of today’s review, is a heist film that is rather formulaic and predictable. Be that as it may, is is still worth a look on Blu-ray? Sort of. Read the full story
Posted on 11 March 2010
“Promise me no one will get hurt.” “No one will get hurt, I promise.” Once those two sentences are uttered near the beginning of Armored, you knew just how this film was going to unfold and that despite the promise, there will be quite few fatalities. Armored, the subject of today’s review, is a heist film that is rather formulaic and predictable. Be that as it may, is is still worth a look on Blu-ray? Sort of. Read the full story
Posted on 05 March 2010
As a film reviewer, it is almost embarrassing to admit that I have viewed none of the films created by directors in the French New Wave. In my defense, I can offer that this “new wave” took place before I was born, and that by the time I was able to cultivate a taste for movies, many of the “new wave’s” inventiveness had already been co-opted by others.
This led me to two important questions I hope to answer in my review. Firstly, if subsequent movies have taken advantage of a once-new filmmaking technique, does this make the originating movies any less relevant? And secondly, can entertainment value survive in what is considered “experimental” cinema? Although films can have artistic merits on their own, they must still be accessible to the common movie viewer. Read the full story
Posted on 05 March 2010
As a film reviewer, it is almost embarrassing to admit that I have viewed none of the films created by directors in the French New Wave. In my defense, I can offer that this “new wave” took place before I was born, and that by the time I was able to cultivate a taste for movies, many of the “new wave’s” inventiveness had already been co-opted by others.
This led me to two important questions I hope to answer in my review. Firstly, if subsequent movies have taken advantage of a once-new filmmaking technique, does this make the originating movies any less relevant? And secondly, can entertainment value survive in what is considered “experimental” cinema? Although films can have artistic merits on their own, they must still be accessible to the common movie viewer. Read the full story
Posted on 05 March 2010
As a film reviewer, it is almost embarrassing to admit that I have viewed none of the films created by directors in the French New Wave. In my defense, I can offer that this “new wave” took place before I was born, and that by the time I was able to cultivate a taste for movies, many of the “new wave’s” inventiveness had already been co-opted by others.
This led me to two important questions I hope to answer in my review. Firstly, if subsequent movies have taken advantage of a once-new filmmaking technique, does this make the originating movies any less relevant? And secondly, can entertainment value survive in what is considered “experimental” cinema? Although films can have artistic merits on their own, they must still be accessible to the common movie viewer. Read the full story
Posted on 05 March 2010
As a film reviewer, it is almost embarrassing to admit that I have viewed none of the films created by directors in the French New Wave. In my defense, I can offer that this “new wave” took place before I was born, and that by the time I was able to cultivate a taste for movies, many of the “new wave’s” inventiveness had already been co-opted by others.
This led me to two important questions I hope to answer in my review. Firstly, if subsequent movies have taken advantage of a once-new filmmaking technique, does this make the originating movies any less relevant? And secondly, can entertainment value survive in what is considered “experimental” cinema? Although films can have artistic merits on their own, they must still be accessible to the common movie viewer. Read the full story
Posted on 05 March 2010
As a film reviewer, it is almost embarrassing to admit that I have viewed none of the films created by directors in the French New Wave. In my defense, I can offer that this “new wave” took place before I was born, and that by the time I was able to cultivate a taste for movies, many of the “new wave’s” inventiveness had already been co-opted by others.
This led me to two important questions I hope to answer in my review. Firstly, if subsequent movies have taken advantage of a once-new filmmaking technique, does this make the originating movies any less relevant? And secondly, can entertainment value survive in what is considered “experimental” cinema? Although films can have artistic merits on their own, they must still be accessible to the common movie viewer. Read the full story
Posted on 05 March 2010
As a film reviewer, it is almost embarrassing to admit that I have viewed none of the films created by directors in the French New Wave. In my defense, I can offer that this “new wave” took place before I was born, and that by the time I was able to cultivate a taste for movies, many of the “new wave’s” inventiveness had already been co-opted by others.
This led me to two important questions I hope to answer in my review. Firstly, if subsequent movies have taken advantage of a once-new filmmaking technique, does this make the originating movies any less relevant? And secondly, can entertainment value survive in what is considered “experimental” cinema? Although films can have artistic merits on their own, they must still be accessible to the common movie viewer. Read the full story